By Kathleen Kelley
JPI InternMaybe it was the location or my personal perspective being a first timer on the Hill, but Rep. Tony Cardenas opening remarks for the Building Safe and Strong Communities: A Conversation about Community-Based Alternatives for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth Congressional Briefing really resonated with me. His words were powerful and passionate.
He was addressing the gathering of policy makers, advocates, lawyers, and other
juvenile
justice related professionals that filled the seats, but yet Rep. Cardenas
was also reaching out to the whole Hill, the others beyond the room. He
asked just how committed are we? Are we as committed as Martin Luther
King Jr. who marched on Washington with thousands of committed individuals?
He expressed the dire need for truly committed individuals to express their
commitment strongly with the issue of the incarceration of juveniles and the
overrepresentation of minority youth, especially African-American youth.
Rep.
Cardenas makes an excellent point, but as I enter the public policy sector of
criminal justice and especially of public policy, I see the march being
made. The current group of extremely passionate and driven individuals
making that march is very much present and devoted. Good examples are the
very panelists that were introduced by Rep.Cardenas.
The panelists represented all different areas of the juvenile justice
system. Judge Denise Navarre
Cubbon has implemented very progressive programs such as RECLAIM
Ohio that greatly reduced the amount of young people at the Ohio Department
of Youth Services institutions, and allocated those funds to create assessment
centers that create alternatives solutions to incarceration sentences. Shaena Fazal’s research and subsequent report, Safely Home, published by Youth
Advocate Programs, names ways that this issue of over using
incarceration with juveniles by pointing out the “bright spots” where programs and the system are working in partnerships
with the communities that juveniles come from.
Dr. Angela Irvine with the National Council of Crime and Delinquency, discussed three clear ways to aid in this issue: 1) sight and sound separation between youth and adults whenever youth are held in an adult facility; 2) status offenders should not be incarcerated; 3) states need to continue to try to decrease the racial disparities grossly apparent in the system. Steve Gates is a role model in his own community who works closely with the Youth Advocate Programs. He expressed the need to take an individual approach with each juvenile justice case not with a groups of kids and that there cannot be a completely punitive approach to juvenile justice.
Dr. Angela Irvine with the National Council of Crime and Delinquency, discussed three clear ways to aid in this issue: 1) sight and sound separation between youth and adults whenever youth are held in an adult facility; 2) status offenders should not be incarcerated; 3) states need to continue to try to decrease the racial disparities grossly apparent in the system. Steve Gates is a role model in his own community who works closely with the Youth Advocate Programs. He expressed the need to take an individual approach with each juvenile justice case not with a groups of kids and that there cannot be a completely punitive approach to juvenile justice.
There were also three big themes that each
speaker spoke passionately about:
- Resources need to be allocated to the appropriate programs, including the human resource as discussed by Gates;
- More research needs to be done and the great research that is out there needs to be disseminated more broadly;
- The significant racial and ethnic disparities in the system, particularly for African-Americans youth in the system. Dr. Irvine mentioned a statistic from her research: in 2008, African Americans were three times overrepresented in the juvenile system and there was an 80% disproportionately rate for all youth of color.
For a first timer on the Hill, I actually left feeling that
there are those people that will continue to fight with a commitment that
matched great advocates of the past. There were some big issues discussed,
but overall, I felt like policymakers, researchers, advocates, juvenile justice
professionals, and politicians are all on the same page as to what needs to be
done. Even more important, they understand how it needs to be done in order to
fix the ineffective and overuse of the incarceration of youth. I have no doubt
that the right solution will get put into place.
Kathleen Kelley is Justice Policy Institute’s research intern. She is working on her Master’s in Justice, Law, and Criminology with a concentration in Public Policy from American University. She also has a Bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice from High Point University.
No comments:
Post a Comment