By David Muhammad
Just Policy Blog Guest
Youth
Advocate Programs (YAP) released a new report, “Safely Home,” which adds momentum to a growing
movement to drastically reform the juvenile justice system. YAP’s report makes
a strong argument for reducing incarceration and investing the savings in doing
so in community based programs that serve youth.
“Supporting
youth and families in their homes and communities should be the default for
justice-involved youth, and incarceration the last alternative,” the report
states. YAP is a national youth serving agency that provides community supports
to high risk youth.
Numerous
studies have found that involvement in the juvenile justice system, even while
controlling for other factors, causes youth to have worse outcomes. One
study found that for youth who commit non-violent crimes, which are the majority
of youth in the system, “doing nothing” creates better outcomes than placing
them in the juvenile justice system (Gatti, Tremblay and Vitar, 2009).
Another
recent study
that rigorously examined the effects of the juvenile justice system found that
incarceration itself resulted in “large
decreases in the likelihood of high school completion and large increases in
the likelihood of adult incarceration.” (Aizer and Doyle, 2013)
And
while many youth enter the juvenile justice system having experienced
tremendous trauma, which is often what led to their delinquent act, the system
frequently further traumatizes youth with horrible treatment inside of
prison-like facilities.
Not
only is the system failing, it is also extremely expensive. Nationally,
juvenile incarceration averages $88,000 per year for each youth (American Correctional
Association, 2008).
Some places are much more expensive. California spends more than $200,000
annually to incarcerate a single youth in a state facility and more than
$100,000 a year for each bed in a juvenile detention center.
The
evidence is clear: juvenile incarceration is ineffective, harmful, and
excessive expensive. It is time for massive reform of the system.
“Risk
factors that make youth vulnerable to incarceration cannot be eliminated
through incarceration,” YAP’s new report states. “Many of the environmental and
social factors that contribute to youth incarceration get worse, not better
with incarceration.”
The
good news is that YAP’s report highlights several programs throughout the
country that have been successful. The study points out jurisdictions that have
already significantly reduced their juvenile incarceration rates. For instance,
Alabama went from 3,340 youth in custody in 2006, to 1,485 in 2013. Lucas
County, Ohio used to have 300 youth committed to the state system in 1988, a
number that is now all the way down to 17. Though not directly mentioned in the
report, California has also had a drastic drop in juvenile incarceration. The state’s
Department of Juvenile Justice used to have 10,000 youth inmates in 1996, today
there are less than 700.
While
this is certainly cause for celebration, there remains 70,000 children
incarcerated in America, and hundreds of thousands more on probation. There is
still much work to do.
Safely Home promotes the
use of community-based programs that can serve high-risk youth in their
neighborhoods more effectively and far less costly than incarceration. The
report notes a study by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice that looked at
system-involved youth who were provided services in their neighborhoods. The
study found that “of 3,523 youth living at home and supported by an intensive
community-based program, 85 percent remained arrest free while in the program, and
93 percent remained living at home at the end of the services.”
A
few jurisdictions around the country are beginning to implement major reforms
of their systems with significant success. In Washington, D.C., the Department
of Youth Rehabilitation Services replaced its old deficit-based, punitive
system with a Positive Youth Development approach. Since D.C.’s reform effort
began in 2005, the recidivism rate of youth in the system has plummeted, and
the number of youth receiving services and supports in the community has
skyrocketed.
Wayne
County, Michigan has led the country in juvenile justice reform by overhauling
its probation system, turning over responsibility of direct supervision and
services of adjudicated youth to CBOs, called Care Management Organizations. Wayne
County’s own juvenile justice system states that their “new model’s commitment
was to treat each individual youth as
a person (within a family context) in need of opportunities and resources
rather than a societal disease that needed to be contained.”
Youth
Advocate Programs’ report is an inspiration to those of us who are working to
reform a broken system. Though there are signs of progress throughout the
country, we can do much better with young people who get in trouble. Safely Home provides a road map of how
to keep young people in their home, serving their needs in their neighborhood,
and keeping the community safe.
David Muhammad is the National Director of Justice
Programs at the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. For more about NCCD,
visit www.nccdglobal.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment