Let’s clear something up right away: Bail and money bail are not the same thing. Bail refers to any condition of pretrial release. Lots of conditions of release have nothing to do with money; supervision and monitoring, for instance. It’s money bail, specifically, that requires someone to pay an amount of money to get released pretrial, making a person’s financial resources a determining factor in whether or not that person sits in jail.
The bail system in Baltimore
relies almost exclusively on money bail. Last spring, I interviewed 13experts on the Baltimore
bail system, and I asked all of them the following question:
What is the purpose of bail?
What I heard over and over again was this: Bail is supposed
to do two things. One: make sure that someone comes back to court for their trial.
Two: protect public safety.
Wait a second. How does a system that relies on money bail
protect public safety? Money bail doesn’t keep violent people locked up; it
just keeps poor people locked up.
People who may pose a threat to public safety can still get out of jail; they
just need to have the money to do it.
And that’s just one of many problems when it comes to bail
in Baltimore.
Seven of the 13 people I interviewed were individuals
whose lives had been directly impacted by the Baltimore bail system. The offenses that they
were charged with ranged from probation violations to attempted murder. Some of
the folks I spoke with had sat in jail for six weeks or six months before going
to trial. One person had waited an entire year. One whole year in jail before he was even tried in court. What happened to
“innocent until proven guilty?"
The people who shared their stories with me talked about the
impact that waiting in jail for so long had on their lives. They lost their
jobs; they weren’t able to continue their education; they couldn’t provide for
their families.
One person said that although he has broken the law before, most
of his arrests have been for offenses he didn’t commit. Still, he has almost
always pleaded guilty, even for the
things he didn’t do. Why? He knew that he couldn’t come up with the money
for bail, which would mean he would be sitting in jail -- indefinitely. Taking the
plea meant getting out sooner. A money bail system like Baltimore’s makes people choose between defending
their innocence and keeping a job, staying in school, and feeding their kids.
Which would you choose?
Which would you choose?
Jean Chung is a former Hunger Fellow and author of Bailing on Baltimore.
Note: JPI has named September JPI Bail Month and has published a
series of reports on bail, for-profit bail bonding and the community impacts of bail. JPI has also hosted a series of events
throughout the month including panel discussions and conference calls.
The finale event is this afternoon (Thursday, September 27) in Washington, DC. RSVP by clicking here.
Thanks for sharing. This is great information. If you have got your vehicle damaged in Accident we can help you have a vehicle replacement on credit. You can hire from us a vehicle on credit till all the issues are settled. For Credit hire services contact us...
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree that a money bail system may not be the most fair system I would think releasing everyone without any requirements would be catastrophic. PTS programs have in fact been found to make no better determination, with abscond rates and recidivism rates only nominally better, with some questioning if they are creating even busier dockets now with violation hearings.
ReplyDelete