By Tatiana Laing
This month, I had the opportunity to attend two events on policing. They had different focuses, but a common tone, and left me sure of one thing: We need to reform the way we police in America.
On March 4th, I attended Values Based Policing, hosted by the Police Foundation. The presenter at this event was Dr. Richard Adams, Chief Inspector of Police Scotland. In addition to serving as a police officer in Scotland for over 20 years, Dr. Adams attained a law degree, a Master’s in International Law and a professional doctorate in Policing. As the one of the individuals charged with creating a code of ethics for Scotland’s national police force, Adams had a lot of interesting insights on the difference in policing between Scotland and the United States. Given the recent Department of Justice report concluding that the Ferguson police department had routinely violated the civil rights of the community, Dr. Adams’ talk on the values of policing was particularly interesting.
Sitting through this event, I couldn’t help but wonder how policing in the United States could improve if there was a focus on trust and respect between police officers and the communities they serve rather than on making as many arrests as possible.
I was able to explore this disconnect between police and communities when I attended another event on March 16th, “Broken Windows or Broken Badges,” hosted by New America. This event focused on the role of police, given recent events in Ferguson, Staten Island and throughout the country, which have created a movement against police brutality (particularly among communities of color).
“The task force was created to strengthen community policing and trust among law enforcement officers and the communities they serve, especially in light of recent events around the country that have underscored the need for and importance of lasting collaborative relationships between local police and the public."
The panelists criticized the recommendations of the report, calling the report rushed and surface level. While Dr. Carr and Ms. House agreed that police should address that they have contributed to the criminalization of communities of color, Sgt. Burton disagreed and also claimed that a lack of resources would continue to inhibit police from changing any protocols.The only thing that all of the panelists seemed to agree on was that police officers have to combat distrust that has a historical context.
Despite law enforcement’s mandate to serve and protect the people, communities of color have rarely viewed police as officials who perform either of these functions—too often falling short in enforcing the laws fairly or doing so in a way that is blatantly unjust. If this country is to ever see a beneficial relationship between police and minority communities, the police departments should adjust attitudes and stress the importance of integrity, fairness, and respect.
Police should focus on protecting communities rather than defending themselves from dangers that may not even exist. In addition to changing attitudes, our police force must become aware of their own implicit biases. We ask police to make life or death decisions in a split second; that’s only enough time to act on biases rather then to think about the racial implications of the assumptions he/she could be making. But if more police departments focused on these assumptions and biases and how to overcome them, then many more unarmed people of color will survive interactions with the police.
Tatiana Laing is JPI's communications intern. She is is a junior honors student in the School of Public Affairs at American University, majoring in CLEG (Communications, Law, Economics, and Government).